Evidence-Based Research

Faecal Microbiota Transplantation:
The Science, The Evidence, The Future

If you're here, you've likely been searching for answers for a long time. This page is a comprehensive, evidence-based resource on FMT — what it is, what the research shows, and where the science is heading.

Published by The Microbiome Clinic™ — Australia's first medical practice dedicated exclusively to microbiome medicine.

Check if FMT has been studied for your condition
Donor microbiota Dysbiosis Restored
Scroll to explore
Understanding FMT

What is Faecal Microbiota Transplantation?

An ancient therapy backed by modern science — here's what it is, where it came from, and how it works.

In plain English

Faecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) is the process of transferring processed stool — containing bacteria, fungi, and other microbes — from a carefully screened healthy donor into the gut of an unwell patient.1 The goal is to restore a healthy, diverse microbial ecosystem in a gut that has lost its balance — a state known as dysbiosis.2 Think of it as an ecosystem restoration project for your gut — reintroducing the full community of beneficial microorganisms that your body needs to function properly.

4th Century
First recorded use — ancient China
Chinese physician Ge Hong describes "yellow soup" — a human faecal suspension given orally to patients with severe diarrhoea and food poisoning — in the Dong-jin dynasty.3
1958
Modern FMT enters Western medicine
Dr Ben Eiseman and colleagues at Denver General Hospital successfully treat four patients with pseudomembranous colitis using faecal enemas — the first documented modern application.4
1988
First use for ulcerative colitis — Australia
Australian Professor Thomas Borody treats the first ulcerative colitis patient with FMT, leading to long-term symptom resolution and opening FMT to non-infectious conditions.5
2013
Landmark RCT proves FMT superior to antibiotics
The first randomised controlled trial, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, is stopped early because FMT is so clearly superior to vancomycin for recurrent C. difficile infection.6
2021
Australia's TGA regulates FMT products
Australia's Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) introduces TGO 105 — formal regulation of FMT products as biologicals, requiring GMP-licensed manufacturing, rigorous donor screening, and ARTG registration.7
2022–23
First commercially approved FMT products
The TGA approves Biomictra (Nov 2022). The US FDA approves Rebyota (rectal, Nov 2022) and Vowst (oral capsule, Apr 2023) — the first commercially manufactured FMT products for recurrent C. difficile.8

How does FMT actually work?

Researchers have identified three primary mechanisms through which FMT restores gut health.9

Colonisation resistance
Healthy donor microbes outcompete pathogens for nutrients and physical space in the gut, restoring the natural "barrier" that prevents harmful organisms from gaining a foothold.9
Restoring microbial diversity
FMT reintroduces hundreds of bacterial species — including key producers of short-chain fatty acids like butyrate — that nourish the gut lining and support metabolic function.10
Immune modulation
Transplanted microbiota interact with the gut-associated immune system, promoting regulatory T cells and reducing pro-inflammatory signalling — calming systemic inflammation at its source.11

How is FMT delivered?

In Australia, FMT is most commonly delivered via colonoscopy or rectal enema — allowing the transplanted material to be introduced directly into the large intestine where the microbial ecosystem resides. This approach has been the standard in clinical practice since Eiseman's pioneering work in 1958 and remains the most widely used method in Australian clinical settings.4

The donor stool is collected, diluted with sterile saline, filtered to remove particulate matter, and then administered during a standard endoscopic procedure. In some international settings, encapsulated oral preparations have also received regulatory approval — such as Vowst (SER-109), approved by the US FDA in 2023, which contains purified bacterial spores in capsule form.8

Donor screening and safety in Australia

FMT in Australia is regulated by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) as a biological product under TGO 105, which came into effect on 1 July 2021.7 This means every FMT product supplied in Australia must be included in the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG) and comply with Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) standards.

Donor screening is rigorous and multi-layered. The TGA mandates a three-tier screening process:12

TGA Three-Tier Donor Screening
Tier 1 — Medical and social history. An extensive questionnaire and face-to-face interview covering infection risk, medication use, lifestyle factors, travel history, and family medical history.

Tier 2 — Blood and stool testing. Comprehensive laboratory screening for infectious agents including hepatitis, HIV, multi-drug resistant organisms, parasites, and pathogenic bacteria.

Tier 3 — Physical assessment. A clinical examination of the proposed donor to identify any conditions that may affect stool quality or recipient safety.

These protocols align with international consensus guidelines, including those established by the European FMT Working Group.2 Only a small fraction of potential donors meet the eligibility criteria — in one Australian stool bank program, just 4.5% of interested donors were ultimately accepted into the program after screening.13

References (13)
  1. Bakken JS et al. Treating Clostridium difficile infection with fecal microbiota transplantation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9(12):1044–9.
  2. Cammarota G et al. European consensus conference on faecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practice. Gut. 2017;66(4):569–580.
  3. Zhang F et al. Should we standardize the 1,700-year-old fecal microbiota transplantation? Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(11):1755.
  4. Eiseman B et al. Fecal enema as an adjunct in the treatment of pseudomembranous enterocolitis. Surgery. 1958;44(5):854–9.
  5. Borody TJ et al. Bowel-flora alteration: a potential cure for inflammatory bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome? Med J Aust. 1989;150(10):604.
  6. van Nood E et al. Duodenal infusion of donor feces for recurrent Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(5):407–15.
  7. Therapeutic Goods Administration. Therapeutic Goods (Standard for Faecal Microbiota Transplant Products) (TGO 105) Order 2020. Commenced 1 July 2021. tga.gov.au
  8. US FDA approvals: Rebyota (RBX2660), Nov 2022; Vowst (SER-109), Apr 2023. TGA approval: Biomictra, Nov 2022.
  9. Khoruts A, Sadowsky MJ. Understanding the mechanisms of faecal microbiota transplantation. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;13(9):508–16.
  10. Sokol H et al. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii is an anti-inflammatory commensal bacterium. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008;105(43):16731–6. Vrieze A et al. Transfer of intestinal microbiota from lean donors increases insulin sensitivity. Gastroenterology. 2012;143(4):913–6.
  11. Burrello C et al. Therapeutic faecal microbiota transplantation controls intestinal inflammation through IL10 secretion by immune cells. Nat Commun. 2018;9:5184.
  12. TGA. Guidance on interpretation of TGO 105 — Standards for Faecal Microbiota Transplant Products. tga.gov.au
  13. Tucker EC et al. Stool donor screening within a TGA-compliant donor screening program for fecal microbiota transplantation. JGH Open. 2023;7(3):198–204.
The Research

The Evidence — Condition by Condition

What does the published clinical research actually show? We've reviewed the evidence for every condition where FMT has been studied — from gold-standard RCTs to emerging case reports.

Recurrent C. difficile Infection
Strong Approved — FDA & TGA

Recurrent C. difficile infection is the gold standard for FMT — the only indication with regulatory approval and strong guideline endorsement. The pivotal 2013 trial by van Nood et al. was stopped early because FMT was so clearly superior to vancomycin, achieving 81% resolution (94% after a second infusion) versus just 31% for the antibiotic alone.van Nood 2013

A 2017 meta-analysis pooling 37 studies confirmed an overall cure rate of 92%, with colonoscopic delivery achieving 95%.Quraishi 2017 The 2023 Cochrane review further validated these findings (NNT = 3). Two FDA-approved products now exist: Rebyota (rectal, Nov 2022) and Vowst (oral capsules, Apr 2023). In Australia, Biomictra received TGA approval in November 2022 and is now supplied to 33+ hospitals via BiomeBank.

92%
Overall cure rate (meta-analysis)
95%
Colonoscopic delivery
NNT 3
Cochrane 2023

Australian real-world data from Tucker et al. (2025) — 220 FMT cases from South Australia — confirms cure rates consistent with international trials: 81% after first FMT, 91% after second, with serious adverse events in only 3% of cases.Tucker 2025 The AGA 2024 guideline suggests fecal microbiota-based therapies for immunocompetent adults with recurrent CDI after standard antibiotics.AGA 2024

Key studies
van Nood et al. 2013N Engl J Med — RCT, n=43. 81% cure vs 31% vancomycin.PubMed
Cammarota et al. 2015Aliment Pharmacol Ther — RCT. 90% vs 26%.PubMed
Hvas et al. 2019Gastroenterology — RCT, n=64. 92% cure, beat fidaxomicin (54%).PubMed
Quraishi et al. 2017Aliment Pharmacol Ther — Meta-analysis, 37 studies. 92% cure.PubMed
Tucker et al. 2025Open Forum Infect Dis — 220 Australian cases. 81–91% cure.PubMed
Ulcerative Colitis
Growing Investigational — 5 RCTs completed

Ulcerative colitis is the most actively researched non-CDI indication for FMT, with Australian researchers contributing three of the five landmark RCTs. The FOCUS trial (Paramsothy et al., 2017) — the largest FMT-UC trial at publication — randomised 85 patients across three Sydney hospitals and achieved 27% steroid-free remission versus 8% placebo.Paramsothy 2017

The Adelaide-based Costello trial (2019) introduced anaerobic stool processing — preserving oxygen-sensitive bacteria — and achieved the highest remission rate among the original trials: 32% versus 9%.Costello 2019 Most striking was the Sydney LOTUS trial (Haifer et al., 2022), combining antibiotic preconditioning with oral capsules to achieve 53% remission versus 15% placebo — and demonstrating that 100% of patients who continued FMT maintained remission, while 100% who stopped relapsed.Haifer 2022

53%
Best trial remission (LOTUS)
5 RCTs
Completed trials
OR 2.25
Pooled effect (14 RCTs, 2025)

A 2025 meta-analysis of 14 RCTs (600 patients) confirmed a significant benefit with OR 2.25 for combined clinical and endoscopic remission.Gefen 2025 Current guidelines restrict FMT for UC to clinical trials, but the Australian contribution — through the FOCUS and LOTUS trials and BiomeBank infrastructure — positions local clinicians at the forefront of this research.

Key studies
Paramsothy et al. 2017Lancet — FOCUS trial, n=85. 27% vs 8%.PubMed
Costello et al. 2019JAMA — Anaerobic FMT, n=73. 32% vs 9%.PubMed
Haifer et al. 2022Lancet Gastro Hepatol — LOTUS, n=35. 53% vs 15%.PubMed
Moayyedi et al. 2015Gastroenterology — First positive RCT. "Super-donor" identified.PubMed
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)
Growing Investigational — donor selection critical

The IBS-FMT literature reveals a striking pattern: donor selection and delivery method are everything. The standout trial is El-Salhy et al. (2020), a Norwegian RCT of 165 patients using a single carefully selected "super-donor" — a healthy 36-year-old male with minimal antibiotic exposure and high microbial diversity. Response rates were 76.9% (30g dose) and 89.1% (60g) versus 23.6% placebo.El-Salhy 2020 Remarkably, 3-year follow-up showed sustained response in 65–72% of recipients.El-Salhy 2022

By contrast, trials using unselected donors or capsule delivery have consistently failed — some even performing worse than placebo. Meta-analyses show endoscopic delivery is significantly effective (RR 3.03) while capsules are not. The critical insight: FMT for IBS works when you get the donor, dose, and delivery right. All IBS subtypes (IBS-D, IBS-C, IBS-M) responded. Current guidelines recommend against routine use pending standardised protocols.

89%
Best response (super-donor, 60g)
65–72%
Sustained at 3 years
RR 3.03
Endoscopic delivery effect
Key studies
El-Salhy et al. 2020Gut — RCT, n=165. Super-donor. 89% vs 24%.PubMed
El-Salhy et al. 2022Gastroenterology — 3-year follow-up. 65–72% sustained.PubMed
Johnsen et al. 2018Lancet Gastro Hepatol — RCT. 65% vs 43% (unselected donors).PubMed
Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO)
Early-stage Investigational — 1 RCT + mechanistic

The direct evidence for FMT in SIBO is limited but mechanistically compelling. The only published placebo-controlled trial — Xu et al. (2021), a Chinese RCT of 55 SIBO patients — randomised participants to oral FMT capsules or placebo for 4 weeks. Symptom scores decreased significantly in the FMT group at 1, 3, and 6 months, breath test hydrogen normalised, and microbial diversity increased toward donor profiles.Xu 2021

A 2024 mBio study of 218 chronic constipation patients found those with coexisting SIBO responded significantly better to FMT than those without (P=0.003) — and small intestinal microbiota changed more than colonic microbiota, suggesting FMT can specifically modify small intestinal dysbiosis. The mechanistic rationale includes restoring colonisation resistance against overgrown organisms, normalising migrating motor complex function, and restoring bile acid metabolism.

1 RCT
Published (n=55)
P=0.003
SIBO patients respond better
Key studies
Xu et al. 2021BMC Gastroenterology — RCT, n=55. Significant improvement at 1, 3, 6 months.PubMed
Gu et al. 2017J Neurogastroenterol Motil — SIBO eliminated in 71% post-FMT.PubMed
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)
Growing Investigational — open-label positive, RCT mixed

The FMT-autism field exemplifies the tension between compelling open-label results and the challenge of placebo-controlled trials. The landmark Arizona State study (Kang et al., 2017) — designed with protocol input from Australia's Thomas Borody — treated 18 children with ASD and GI symptoms using a full MTT protocol (vancomycin, bowel cleanse, 7–8 weeks treatment). GI symptoms improved by approximately 80%, with significant behavioural improvements across CARS, SRS, and ABC measures.Kang 2017

The two-year follow-up was remarkable: professional assessments showed a 45% reduction in core ASD symptoms. At baseline, 83% were rated "severe" autism; at two years, only 17% remained "severe," 39% were "mild/moderate," and 44% fell below the ASD diagnostic cut-off.Kang 2019 However, the largest RCT (Wan et al., 2024; n=103) found no significant difference between FMT and placebo on primary behavioural outcomes — though it used a very different protocol (no antibiotics, no bowel cleanse, capsules only).Wan 2024

80%
GI improvement (open-label)
45%
ASD symptom reduction at 2yr
318
Children in largest ongoing RCT (China)

The FTACMT study — a multicentre, double-blind RCT enrolling 318 children across 15 Chinese hospitals — is currently the largest trial and may provide definitive data. An Australian RCT enrolling 100 adolescents and adults is also in progress. No clinical guidelines currently recommend FMT for ASD.

Key studies
Kang et al. 2017Microbiome — Open-label MTT, n=18. 80% GI improvement.PubMed
Kang et al. 2019Sci Reports — 2-year follow-up. 45% ASD symptom reduction.PubMed
Wan et al. 2024Clin Transl Med — RCT, n=103. Negative primary outcome.PubMed
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
Growing Investigational — pilot RCT + meta-analysis

The first controlled trial of FMT specifically for depression was conducted in Australia — the Moving Moods study at Deakin University (Green et al., 2023), using BiomeBank's FMT product. Though small (n=15), it demonstrated safety, feasibility, and enormous patient demand — over 160 expressions of interest in just two months against a target of 15. The active FMT group showed significantly greater improvement in GI symptoms, with near-significant quality-of-life improvements.Green 2023

A 2025 meta-analysis pooling 12 RCTs with 681 participants found FMT significantly reduced depressive symptoms (SMD = −1.21, P = 0.0003). Both oral capsule and direct GI delivery were effective, with improvements most notable in the first few months. Emerging research suggests FMT may enhance the effects of conventional antidepressants — Jiang et al. (2025) demonstrated multi-omic mechanisms by which FMT boosts SSRI efficacy.

12 RCTs
Pooled in meta-analysis
681
Total participants
P=0.0003
Significant reduction
Key studies
Green et al. 2023Can J Psychiatry — Pilot RCT, n=15. Australian. First for MDD.PubMed
2025 Meta-analysisFront Psychiatry — 12 RCTs, 681 patients. SMD = −1.21.PubMed
Jiang et al. 2025Brain Behav Immun — FMT enhances SSRI efficacy.PubMed
Anxiety Disorders
Early-stage Investigational — secondary outcomes + preclinical

No clinical trials have yet tested FMT specifically for primary anxiety disorders, but the evidence connecting gut bacteria to anxiety is compelling. People with generalised anxiety disorder have been found to have significantly elevated levels of Escherichia-Shigella bacteria compared to healthy controls. Strikingly, Ritz et al. (2024) demonstrated that transplanting gut microbiota from individuals with social anxiety disorder into mice reliably produces anxiety-like behaviour in the recipients.Ritz 2024

Several clinical trials of FMT for other conditions — particularly IBS and depression — have reported improvements in anxiety as a secondary outcome. Notably, one study found these improvements occurred independently of any changes in gut symptoms, suggesting a direct microbiome-brain pathway. A 2024 systematic review of 14 studies confirmed FMT's potential to modify the bacterial markers associated with GAD. Dedicated clinical trials are expected as the field matures.

Key studies
Baske et al. 2024J Affect Disord — Systematic review, 14 studies. FMT reduces GAD-linked bacteria.PubMed
Ritz et al. 2024PNAS — Social anxiety microbiota transfers fear to mice.PubMed
Parkinson's Disease
Growing Investigational — multiple RCTs (mixed)

Parkinson's disease has one of the strongest established connections to the gut microbiome of any neurological condition. The "gut-first" hypothesis proposes that PD pathology may begin in the gut before spreading to the brain via the vagus nerve — supported by the fact that gut dysfunction, especially constipation, often precedes motor symptoms by years or even decades. Lewy body pathology has been found in the gut's own nervous system.

The most notable trial is the GUT-PARFECT study (Bruggeman et al., 2024) — a double-blind RCT of 46 early-stage PD patients. A single FMT treatment produced statistically significant and clinically meaningful motor improvement at 12 months (P = 0.0235), with the most pronounced improvement occurring between 6 and 12 months — suggesting a potentially disease-modifying effect.Bruggeman 2024 A Chinese RCT (Cheng et al., 2023; n=54) also showed significant improvement in movement and autonomic symptoms.Cheng 2023

However, a larger Finnish trial (Scheperjans et al., 2024; n=45) published in JAMA Neurology found no significant benefit on its primary outcome, underscoring that donor selection, delivery method, and protocol design are critical variables still being optimised.Scheperjans 2024

P=0.02
Motor improvement (GUT-PARFECT)
4 RCTs
Completed to date
Key studies
Bruggeman et al. 2024eClinicalMedicine — GUT-PARFECT, n=46. Motor improvement at 12m.PubMed
Scheperjans et al. 2024JAMA Neurology — RCT, n=45. Negative primary. Design insights.PubMed
Cheng et al. 2023Gut Microbes — RCT, n=54. Significant autonomic improvement.PubMed
Bipolar Disorder
Early-stage Investigational — case reports + pilot RCT

Bipolar disorder has been associated with distinct gut microbiota profiles, and preclinical research has demonstrated that FMT from individuals with BD into mice produces behavioural changes and metabolic shifts consistent with BD pathology. The most compelling clinical evidence comes from an Australian case report (Parker et al., 2022, UNSW Sydney): a young male with treatment-resistant bipolar disorder experienced distinct improvement in mood oscillations following FMT, was able to cease all psychiatric medications, and maintained improved mood stability for over 470 consecutive days of daily tracking.Parker 2022

A formal pilot RCT is underway in Canada (NCT03279224), and preclinical research from Austria (2023) has demonstrated that microbiome-related metabolic and behavioural traits of BD are partially transferable via FMT — establishing the biological plausibility for therapeutic intervention.

Key studies
Parker et al. 2022Bipolar Disord — Australian case. Ceased all meds, 470+ day response.PubMed
Cooke et al. 2021Pilot Feasibility Stud — Canadian RCT protocol (NCT03279224).PubMed
ME/CFS (Chronic Fatigue Syndrome)
Early-stage Investigational — biological plausibility, RCT negative

The gut-brain axis rationale for FMT in ME/CFS is scientifically compelling — ME/CFS patients consistently show reduced bacterial diversity and elevated markers of microbial translocation. The earliest clinical data came from Australia's Thomas Borody, whose retrospective review of 60 CFS patients reported 70% response to treatment, with long-term follow-up (15–20 years) finding 58% maintained complete symptom resolution.Borody 2012

However, the only completed RCT — Salonen et al. (2023), a Finnish double-blind trial of 11 patients — found no benefit of FMT over sham on any measure. While severely underpowered, this represents the highest-quality evidence currently available. The Norwegian Comeback Study (n=80) has completed recruitment but results suggest it may also be negative. The proposed mechanism — dysbiosis leading to reduced SCFA production, increased gut permeability, bacterial translocation, and ultimately neuroinflammation — remains biologically plausible even as clinical evidence falls short.

Key studies
Borody 2012Retrospective review, n=60. 70% response. 58% sustained 15–20yr.PubMed
Salonen et al. 2023J Transl Med — RCT, n=11. No benefit over sham.PubMed
Giloteaux et al. 2016Microbiome — Reduced diversity + translocation markers.PubMed
PANS / PANDAS
Emerging Investigational — microbiome profiling, no FMT trials

PANS and PANDAS are conditions where children suddenly develop severe OCD, tics, anxiety, and behavioural changes — typically after an infection. In PANDAS, streptococcal infections trigger an autoimmune response where antibodies mistakenly attack parts of the brain. Research has revealed that children with PANS/PANDAS have distinct differences in their gut bacteria, including reduced diversity and an imbalance that promotes inflammation.Quagliariello 2018

Gut microbiome disruption has been linked to altered dopamine metabolism — connecting directly to the brain pathology seen in these patients. A 2025 narrative review of approximately 250 studies confirmed that alterations in gut and oral microbial communities modulate neuroinflammation through increased intestinal and blood-brain barrier permeability, immune dysregulation, and altered neuroactive metabolite production. While no FMT trials have been published specifically for PANS/PANDAS, the condition involves immune dysregulation, gut barrier dysfunction, and microbiome disruption — all of which FMT has addressed in other conditions. Many patients have undergone multiple courses of antibiotics, further damaging their gut microbiome.

Key studies
Quagliariello et al. 2018Front Microbiol — Cross-sectional, n=30. Distinct dysbiosis in PANS/PANDAS.PubMed
2025 Narrative ReviewFront Immunol — ~250 studies. Gut-oral-brain axis in PANS/PANDAS.PubMed
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Emerging Investigational — case report + active RCT

People with RA — particularly those newly diagnosed — harbour a distinct gut microbiome, with higher levels of Prevotella copri and lower levels of anti-inflammatory species. Remarkably, Alpizar-Rodriguez et al. (2019) showed these changes appear before joint symptoms begin, suggesting the gut may be involved in triggering the disease. Pianta et al. (2017) identified specific P. copri peptides that triggered Th1 immune responses in 42% of new-onset RA patients.Pianta 2017

One published case report describes a young woman with treatment-resistant RA who improved after FMT (Zeng et al., 2021). A randomised controlled trial in Canada (NCT05790356) is now testing FMT capsules against placebo in 30 ACPA-positive RA patients, with results anticipated. Preclinical work by Zheng et al. (2023) confirmed the causal direction — FMT from pre-RA individuals into mice worsened arthritis.

Key studies
Scher et al. 2013eLifeP. copri expansion in new-onset RA.PubMed
Zeng et al. 2021Clin Case Reports — First published FMT for RA.PubMed
Lawson RCTNCT05790356 — Double-blind RCT, n=30. Capsule FMT vs placebo in RA.Trial
Ankylosing Spondylitis
Emerging Investigational — strong mechanistic, no completed FMT trials

AS has one of the strongest known connections between gut health and joint disease. Up to 60% of AS patients have silent gut inflammation, and the disease overwhelmingly affects people carrying the HLA-B27 gene. Decades of research have shown that Klebsiella species may trigger the immune system to mistakenly attack joint tissues through molecular mimicry with HLA-B27.

Critically, HLA-B27-positive animals raised in completely germ-free conditions do not develop the disease — only when normal gut bacteria are present does inflammation develop (Taurog et al., 1994). This is among the most powerful demonstrations in any autoimmune condition that the microbiome is essential, not incidental. While no completed FMT trials exist, AS is included in an ongoing Danish clinical trial (NCT04924270) testing FMT in newly diagnosed inflammatory conditions.

Key studies
Taurog et al. 1994J Exp Med — HLA-B27 rats need gut bacteria to develop SpA.PubMed
Costello et al. 2015Arthritis Rheumatol — Specific gut dysbiosis in AS.PubMed
NCT04924270Danish trial — FMT in treatment-naïve inflammatory diseases incl. AS.Trial
Psoriasis / Psoriatic Arthritis
Emerging Investigational — 1 RCT (PsA, negative but safe)

Psoriasis is increasingly recognised as a systemic condition with deep connections to the gut. People with psoriasis consistently show gut microbiome patterns that mirror those seen in inflammatory bowel disease — including reduced Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (anti-inflammatory) and elevated pro-inflammatory species.

The Danish FLORA trial (Kragsnaes et al., 2021) was the first-ever RCT of FMT in any immune-mediated arthritis, testing a single gastroscopic FMT in 31 adults with active PsA. FMT was safe and well-tolerated, but did not improve disease activity compared to sham. The researchers concluded that higher doses, repeated administration, and careful donor selection — factors proven important in FMT for IBD — may be necessary, and modified protocols are now underway.

Key studies
Kragsnaes et al. 2021Ann Rheum Dis — FLORA trial, n=31. Single FMT safe but no efficacy.PubMed
Eppinga et al. 2014J Invest Dermatol — IBD-like microbiome changes in psoriasis.PubMed
Multiple Sclerosis
Emerging Investigational — pilot RCT + case reports

MS patients consistently harbour distinct gut microbiome profiles, and elevated intestinal permeability ("leaky gut") has been documented, providing a pathway for bacterial products to influence CNS inflammation. A pilot RCT (Al et al., 2022) of monthly FMTs in 9 RRMS patients confirmed safety and found that two patients with elevated baseline permeability saw their gut barrier function return to normal after treatment, with beneficial donor-specific microbiome shifts.

Case reports spanning over a decade describe MS symptom improvement following FMT — including one remarkable case where a patient with progressive MS appeared to remain stable for over 10 years after FMT originally administered for a gut infection (Makkawi et al., 2018). A Phase 1b trial at UCSF (NCT03594487) is formally investigating FMT in relapsing-remitting MS with immunological endpoints.

Key studies
Al et al. 2022Pilot RCT, n=9. FMT safe; improved gut permeability in MS.PubMed
Makkawi et al. 2018Case report — SPMS patient stable 10+ years post-FMT.PubMed
Borody et al. 2011Case series, n=3 — MS symptom improvement post-FMT.PubMed
Metabolic Syndrome / Insulin Resistance
Growing Investigational — multiple RCTs + meta-analyses

Metabolic syndrome has the strongest and most replicated metabolic evidence for FMT. The foundational Vrieze et al. (2012) trial demonstrated a ~73% improvement in peripheral insulin sensitivity at 6 weeks after lean-donor FMT in men with metabolic syndrome — an effect size exceeding many pharmacological interventions.Vrieze 2012 Kootte et al. (2017) confirmed the improvement but showed it reverted to baseline by 18 weeks, and that patients with the lowest baseline microbial diversity benefited most.Kootte 2017

A meta-analysis of 9 RCTs (303 participants) confirmed significant reductions in fasting glucose, HbA1c, and insulin. Mocanu et al. (2021) in Nature Medicine showed that combining FMT with fibre supplementation produced the best metabolic outcomes. The central challenge remains durability — effects peak at 6 weeks and diminish without ongoing intervention, suggesting repeated dosing or adjunctive therapies may be needed.Mocanu 2021

73%
Insulin sensitivity improvement
9 RCTs
Meta-analysed (303 pts)
6 wks
Peak effect window
Key studies
Vrieze et al. 2012Gastroenterology — RCT, n=18. 73% insulin sensitivity gain.PubMed
Kootte et al. 2017Cell Metab — RCT, n=38. Transient at 18 wks. Low diversity predicts response.PubMed
Mocanu et al. 2021Nat Med — RCT, n=70. FMT + fiber best outcome.PubMed
Qiu et al. 2023PLOS ONE — Meta-analysis, 9 RCTs, 303 pts.PubMed
Obesity
Growing Investigational — engraftment positive, weight loss negative

FMT for obesity consistently demonstrates successful microbiome engraftment and safety, with some metabolic improvements — but consistently fails to produce clinically meaningful weight loss. The Gut Bugs Trial (Leong et al., 2020), the largest adolescent FMT trial (n=87), showed no BMI change but significantly reduced android-to-gynoid fat ratio and, remarkably, resolved metabolic syndrome in many recipients (adjusted OR 0.06, P=0.007).Leong 2020

The most striking data came from the 4-year follow-up (Wilson et al., 2025): FMT recipients showed smaller waist circumference (−10cm), lower total body fat (−4.8%), lower metabolic syndrome severity, and lower inflammation markers — with donor-derived strains still persisting at 4 years. These are the longest-term FMT outcome data in metabolic disease, though the follow-up was unblinded.Wilson 2025

87
Largest trial (adolescents)
4 yr
Longest follow-up
−10cm
Waist at 4 years
Key studies
Leong et al. 2020JAMA Netw Open — Gut Bugs, n=87. No BMI change; metabolic benefit.PubMed
Wilson et al. 2025Nat Commun — 4-year follow-up. Persistent engraftment + body comp.PubMed
Allegretti et al. 2020Clin Gastro Hepatol — Pilot RCT, n=22. Engraftment but no BMI change.PubMed
Type 2 Diabetes
Growing Investigational — emerging RCTs + metformin synergy

The most directly relevant T2DM trial (Wu et al., 2022) enrolled 31 newly diagnosed patients in three arms: metformin alone, FMT alone, and FMT plus metformin. FMT alone improved insulin resistance and BMI, while FMT plus metformin improved insulin resistance, BMI, fasting glucose, postprandial glucose, and HbA1c — demonstrating that FMT can enhance metformin's effectiveness.Wu 2022

This synergy is biologically grounded: metformin itself partly works through the gut microbiome, increasing Akkermansia muciniphila and modulating bile acid metabolism. Repeated monthly FMTs achieved 100% engraftment at 24 weeks when combined with lifestyle intervention (Ng et al., 2022). A 2024 meta-analysis confirmed pooled reductions in fasting glucose, triglycerides, and HOMA-IR. Pre-treatment microbiome profiling may identify which patients will respond best.Ng 2022

100%
Engraftment (repeated FMT)
Synergy
FMT enhances metformin
Key studies
Wu et al. 2022Front Cell Infect Microbiol — RCT, n=31. FMT + metformin synergy.PubMed
Ng et al. 2022Gut — RCT, n=61. 100% engraftment with repeated FMT + lifestyle.PubMed
Ding et al. 2022Front Cell Infect Microbiol — n=17. Significant HbA1c + glucose reduction.PubMed
NAFLD / MASLD (Fatty Liver Disease)
Early-stage Investigational — proof-of-concept (~137 pts across 4 RCTs)

The liver receives approximately 75% of its blood supply from the portal vein, making it the first-pass organ for all gut-derived products. NAFLD patients show 5-fold greater intestinal permeability than controls. The mechanistic case is compelling — bacterial endotoxins, endogenous alcohol production by gut bacteria, choline depletion, and bile acid dysregulation all drive hepatic fat accumulation and inflammation.

However, clinical evidence remains at proof-of-concept with approximately 137 total patients across 4 completed RCTs. No trial has demonstrated robust improvement in primary endpoints of hepatic fat or metabolic parameters. The only trial with paired liver biopsies (Witjes et al., 2020) showed a trend toward improved inflammation but no significant change. A key insight from Groenewegen et al. (2025): responders correlated with donor-specific engraftment patterns, highlighting that donor selection may be the critical variable.Groenewegen 2025

Key studies
Craven et al. 2020Am J Gastroenterol — RCT, n=21. No primary endpoint; gut barrier improved.PubMed
Witjes et al. 2020Hepatol Commun — RCT, n=21. Paired biopsies. Trend only.PubMed
Groenewegen et al. 2025Gut Microbes — RCT, n=20. Donor selection critical.PubMed
Hepatic Encephalopathy
Strong Investigational — Phase II RCT (THEMATIC, n=60)

Hepatic encephalopathy — brain fog caused by liver disease — often recurs despite standard medications. Cirrhosis-associated dysbiosis leads to overgrowth of ammonia-producing bacteria with depletion of beneficial SCFA-producing taxa. In the landmark THEMATIC trial (Bajaj et al., 2025), a Phase II double-blind RCT of 60 patients, FMT produced zero treatment-related serious adverse events, with HE recurrence of 0–13% in FMT groups versus 40% placebo, and hospitalisations reduced from 47% to 7–20%.

Earlier Phase I trials by the same group showed sustained cognitive improvement, zero HE episodes versus 1.5 in controls (P<0.05), and zero hospitalisations versus 3 (P<0.02) over 12+ months of follow-up. Multi-omic analysis revealed that donor engraftment of SCFA-producing taxa correlated directly with lower recurrence. Quality of life improved significantly (P=0.003).

0–13%
HE recurrence (FMT)
40%
HE recurrence (placebo)
60
Patients (THEMATIC)
Key studies
Bajaj et al. 2025J Hepatol — THEMATIC, Phase II RCT, n=60. Zero FMT SAEs.PubMed
Bajaj et al. 2019Gastroenterology — 12-month follow-up. 0 vs 1.5 HE episodes.PubMed
Bajaj et al. 2017Hepatology — Phase I RCT, n=20. SAEs 20% vs 80%.PubMed
Melanoma — Immunotherapy Enhancement
Growing → Strong Investigational — multiple Phase I/II trials

Specific gut bacteria promote anti-tumour immunity by enhancing CD8⁺ T-cell infiltration into tumours. In the MIMic trial (Routy et al., 2023), FMT from healthy donors combined with immunotherapy in treatment-naïve melanoma achieved an overall response rate of 65% (4 complete + 9 partial responses in 20 patients). At nearly 5 years of follow-up, median progression-free survival was 29.6 months and median overall survival was 52.8 months.Routy 2023

The Phase II FMT-LUMINate trial (2024) reported a 70% response rate for FMT combined with dual checkpoint blockade. A 2025 pooled analysis of 10 studies (164 patients) found an overall response rate of 43%, with dual immunotherapy yielding 60% vs 37% for monotherapy (P=0.01). The first large randomised trial (ME.17, pan-Canadian) is now recruiting.

65%
Response rate (MIMic)
70%
Response (FMT-LUMINate)
52.8mo
Median overall survival
Key studies
Routy et al. 2023Nat Med — MIMic, Phase I, n=20. ORR 65%; 5-yr data.PubMed
Baruch et al. 2021Science — Phase I, n=10. 30% response in refractory melanoma.PubMed
Davar et al. 2021Science — Phase I, n=15. 40% clinical benefit.PubMed
GI Graft-versus-Host Disease
Growing Investigational — meta-analysis (242 pts, 64% remission)

After a bone marrow transplant, the donor's immune cells can attack the patient's intestine, causing severe diarrhoea that often resists steroids. A meta-analysis of 242 patients reported a pooled remission rate of 64% (95% CI 51–77%), including many patients who had failed all other treatments. Van Lier et al. (2020) achieved 67% complete remission within one month, with immunosuppressants successfully tapered in 6 of 10 responders.

A Phase III trial of MaaT013 (pooled donor FMT product) for steroid- and JAK-inhibitor-refractory GI-aGVHD is ongoing (NCT04769895). Safety note: one fatal drug-resistant E. coli bacteraemia transmitted by FMT was reported in an immunocompromised patient (DeFilipp et al., 2019, NEJM), prompting enhanced donor screening protocols.

64%
Pooled remission (meta-analysis)
242
Patients studied
Key studies
Zhang et al. 2022Bone Marrow Transplant — Meta-analysis, n=242. 64% remission.PubMed
van Lier et al. 2020Sci Transl Med — n=15. 67% CR within 1 month.PubMed
DeFilipp et al. 2024Blood Advances — n=10. 70% CR at day 28.PubMed
Multidrug-Resistant Organism Decolonisation
Emerging → Growing Investigational — 70% eradication (systematic review)

Antibiotic-resistant "superbugs" can colonise the gut and cause dangerous infections, especially in hospitalised patients. A systematic review (Macareño-Castro et al., 2019) of 121 patients reported an overall FMT eradication rate of 70.3% (VRE 63%, CRE 67%, ESBL 73%). The PREMIX Phase I RCT (Woodworth et al., 2023) found 89% of FMT recipients became MDRO-negative, identifying a novel "conspecific strain competition" mechanism where susceptible strains replace resistant ones.

Important context: spontaneous decolonisation rates are substantial (CRE ~50% at 6 months), making adequately powered RCTs essential. The UK FERARO feasibility RCT (2025, n=41) confirmed lower MDRO carriage at all timepoints in the FMT arm with no unanticipated harms. Colonisation resistance — competitive exclusion by a diverse microbiome — is the primary mechanism.

Key studies
Woodworth et al. 2023Sci Transl Med — PREMIX, Phase I, n=11. 89% clearance.PubMed
Bilinski et al. 2017Clin Infect Dis — n=20. 60% at 1mo, 93% at 6mo.PubMed
Macareño-Castro 2019Ann Med — Systematic review, n=121. 70.3% eradication.PubMed
Chronic Functional Constipation
Growing Investigational — RCT + meta-analysis (~250 pts)

Chronic constipation is associated with depletion of SCFA-producing bacteria and enrichment of methanogens that slow transit. A 2025 meta-analysis of 9 studies (~250 patients) found pooled remission of 50.7% and improvement in 64.8%, with transit time reduced by an average of 20.3 hours and no serious adverse events. The largest RCT (Tian et al., 2017, n=60) found a cure rate of 36.7% FMT vs 13.3% control (P=0.04).

Benefits may fade over several months — one prospective cohort (Ding et al., 2018) showed efficacy declining from 50% at week 4 to 32.7% at week 24, suggesting repeated treatments may be needed. FMT was well-tolerated with only mild temporary side effects.

50.7%
Pooled remission
−20.3hr
Transit time reduction
Key studies
Wang et al. 2025Front Microbiol — Meta-analysis, 9 studies, ~250 pts.PubMed
Tian et al. 2017PLOS ONE — RCT, n=60. 36.7% vs 13.3% cure.PubMed
Alcoholic Hepatitis
Growing Investigational — RCT (n=120) + meta-analysis (371 pts)

Severe alcoholic hepatitis is life-threatening with limited treatment options. Pande et al. (2023) conducted an open-label RCT of 120 patients showing 90-day survival of 75% FMT vs 56.6% prednisolone (P=0.044), with infection deaths dramatically lower: 3.6% vs 19.3% (P=0.01). A meta-analysis of 6 studies (371 patients) confirmed a pooled odds ratio for 90-day survival of 3.07 (95% CI 1.81–5.20, P<0.0001).

Important caveats: all major studies are from India, most are open-label, and survival benefit attenuates beyond 90 days. No blinded multicentre RCT has been published. The mechanism centres on restoring eubiosis, reducing endotoxaemia, and decreasing infection risk — a major cause of death where steroids are immunosuppressive.

75%
90-day survival (FMT)
3.07
Survival odds ratio
371
Patients (meta-analysis)
Key studies
Pande et al. 2023Hepatol Int — RCT, n=120. 75% vs 57% survival.PubMed
Taha et al. 2024JGH Open — Meta-analysis, n=371. OR 3.07.PubMed
Chronic Hepatitis B
Early-stage Investigational — small pilots only (~30 pts)

A few small studies have explored whether FMT could help the immune system clear hepatitis B. Chauhan et al. (2021) reported HBeAg clearance in 16.7% (2/12) of FMT recipients versus 0% controls after 6 cycles via nasoduodenal tube. A Chinese prospective study found 36.4% (4/11) HBeAg-positive patients achieved negative conversion with decreased inflammatory markers. No HBsAg loss has been achieved in any study.

Only approximately 30 patients have been studied across all trials, all from India and China. The mechanism centres on restoring immune tolerance mechanisms and enhancing T-cell responsiveness to HBV antigens through the gut-liver axis. This remains a very early research area.

Key studies
Chauhan et al. 2021Dig Dis Sci — Pilot, n=27. 16.7% HBeAg clearance.PubMed
Ren et al. 2017Hepatology — Pilot, n=18. Significant HBeAg decline.PubMed
Liver Cirrhosis
Growing Investigational — multiple Phase I/II trials

Cirrhosis features profound gut dysbiosis with "oralisation" of the faecal microbiome, depletion of SCFA-producing bacteria, and disrupted bile acid metabolism. Multiple Phase I/II trials have confirmed FMT is safe in cirrhosis and can restore healthier gut bacteria, reduce blood inflammation markers, and decrease antibiotic-resistant germs. Bajaj et al. (2021) showed alcohol craving reduced 90% in FMT recipients vs 30% placebo (P=0.02) in patients with alcohol-related cirrhosis, with fewer serious adverse events (2 vs 8, P=0.02).

The THEMATIC trial (2025, n=60) confirmed safety across all doses, routes, and donor types. Pooled analysis showed FMT significantly reduced gut microbial antibiotic resistance genes in cirrhosis patients — an important finding for this population prone to infections.

Key studies
Bajaj et al. 2021Hepatology — Phase I RCT, n=20. Cravings 90% vs 30% reduced.PubMed
Bajaj et al. 2021Hepatol Commun — Pooled analysis. Reduced ARGs.PubMed
Renal Cell Carcinoma — TKI Diarrhoea & ICI
Strong Investigational — RCTs (TKI diarrhoea); Phase 2a (ICI)

FMT has been shown to effectively treat diarrhoea caused by TKI cancer drugs. In an open-label RCT (Ianiro et al., 2019), 100% of FMT patients had diarrhoea resolved within a week vs 54.5% control (P=0.02), with 90% vs 0% resolution by day 15–30 (P=0.0001). Zero FMT patients needed cancer drug dose reductions.

The TACITO trial (Porcari et al., 2025, Nature Medicine) showed that FMT from immunotherapy responders combined with standard treatment more than doubled progression-free survival: median PFS 24.0 vs 9.0 months (HR 0.50, P=0.035), with an overall response rate of 52% vs 32%. This is one of the most clinically significant FMT findings in oncology.

100%
TKI diarrhoea resolved
24mo
PFS with FMT (TACITO)
9mo
PFS without FMT
Key studies
Porcari et al. 2025Nat Med — TACITO, Phase 2a RCT, n=45. PFS 24 vs 9mo.PubMed
Ianiro et al. 2020Nat Commun — RCT, n=20. 100% vs 55% diarrhoea resolution.PubMed
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Emerging Investigational — Phase 2 pilot + preclinical

The gut-liver axis is central to HCC development — chronic liver disease causes "leaky gut," allowing microbial products to drive inflammation and carcinogenesis. Kim et al. (2024) reported one HCC patient with remarkable tumour shrinkage after a donor switch in a Phase 2 trial of mixed tumours. Preclinical studies show FMT suppresses tumour-promoting IL-17A production and repolarises tumour-associated macrophages.

The FAB-HCC pilot (Pomej et al., 2025) is testing FMT combined with atezolizumab/bevacizumab in HCC patients failing first-line immunotherapy. This remains an early-stage, experimental area — FMT for HCC is not available outside of clinical trials.

Key studies
Kim et al. 2024Cell Host Microbe — Phase 2, n=13. 1 HCC tumour shrinkage.PubMed
Pomej et al. 2025PLOS ONE — FAB-HCC protocol. FMT + ICI in HCC.PubMed
Radiation Enteritis & Proctitis
Emerging → Growing Investigational — retrospective (n=127) + case series

For patients with chronic radiation damage to the bowel after radiotherapy, FMT is showing promise. The largest study (Li et al., 2019) of 127 radiation enteritis patients found 77.3% symptom improvement at 3 months, declining to ~60% at 36 months. Individual case reports document dramatic improvement in rectal bleeding and pain after multiple treatment rounds.

Preclinical work (Ding et al., 2025) identified Blautia wexlerae restoration and tryptophan metabolism as a key mechanism. Symptoms may recur over time, suggesting repeated treatments may be needed. No serious complications have been reported, but larger clinical trials are still needed.

Key studies
Li et al. 2019Retrospective, n=127. 77.3% improvement at 3mo.PubMed
Ding et al. 2020Radiother Oncol — Case series, n=5. 60% responded.PubMed
Radiation-Induced GI Syndrome (Acute)
Early-stage Preclinical only — no human trials

When the body receives very high doses of radiation, it can severely damage the gut lining in a potentially life-threatening condition. Animal studies have consistently shown that FMT from healthy mice significantly improves survival, repairs the gut lining, and helps the immune system recover (Cui et al., 2017). The protective effect comes from beneficial bacteria producing tryptophan metabolites (indole-3-carboxaldehyde, kynurenic acid) that shield the gut.

Guo et al. (2020) identified that radiation survivors develop a distinct, protective microbiome enriched in Lachnospiraceae. FMT from metformin-treated mice conferred radiation resistance via FXR activation (Cui et al., 2022). While results are promising and robustly reproduced across multiple laboratories, FMT for acute radiation injury has not yet been tested in humans.

Key studies
Cui et al. 2017EMBO Mol Med — Preclinical. FMT improved survival in irradiated mice.PubMed
Cui et al. 2022Front Microbiol — FMT from metformin-treated mice conferred radioprotection.PubMed
Pouchitis (Post-colectomy)
Emerging Investigational — meta-analysis (103 pts, 30% remission)

For chronic pouchitis after colectomy for UC, a meta-analysis of 9 studies (103 patients) found a pooled clinical response of 42.6% and remission of 29.8% with significant heterogeneity between protocols. A key challenge is that the ileal pouch environment differs substantially from a native colon, making it difficult for transplanted bacteria to establish.

Two RCTs showed limited benefit — one was stopped early due to low remission (1/6). An innovative trial (NCT05829109) is testing stool from patients with healthy pouches rather than from individuals with native colons as donors, which may improve engraftment.

Key studies
Karjalainen et al. 2023J Crohns Colitis — Meta-analysis, n=103. 42.6% response.PubMed
Stallmach et al. 2021IBD — RCT, n=26. No significant benefit.PubMed
Chronic Intestinal Pseudo-Obstruction
Early-stage Investigational — ~10 patients worldwide

CIPO is a rare, severe condition where the bowel fails to move its contents despite no physical blockage. Bercik et al. (2025) demonstrated that mice given gut bacteria from CIPO patients developed similar bowel problems — and a single CIPO patient who received FMT experienced improvement lasting 8 years. A pilot of 9 patients (Gu et al., 2017) found FMT reduced bloating and eliminated SIBO in 71% (5/7).

Only approximately 10 patients have been treated with FMT for CIPO in published literature worldwide. Evidence is extremely limited, and FMT for CIPO should only be considered in a research setting.

Key studies
Bercik et al. 2025Gut Microbes — Translational. 1 patient sustained 8-year benefit.PubMed
Gu et al. 2017J Neurogastroenterol Motil — Pilot, n=9. 71% SIBO eliminated.PubMed
Non-C. diff Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhoea
Theoretical Investigational — no RCTs; strong mechanistic rationale

Suez et al. (2018, Cell) showed that autologous FMT (using banked pre-antibiotic stool) achieved near-complete microbiome recovery within days — outperforming both probiotics (which actually delayed recovery) and spontaneous reconstitution. Taur et al. (2018) confirmed autologous FMT rapidly restored diversity in immunocompromised stem cell transplant patients.

No RCTs exist for FMT specifically in symptomatic non-CDI antibiotic-associated diarrhoea, which typically resolves spontaneously. Research may eventually identify severe or prolonged cases where FMT could help, but this remains an unproven application — likely overtreatment for typical cases.

Key studies
Suez et al. 2018Cell — RCT, n=21. Autologous FMT recovered microbiome in days.PubMed
Taur et al. 2018Sci Transl Med — Autologous FMT in HSCT patients.PubMed
Watch

FMT explained by Dr Paul Froomes

A clear, evidence-based overview of faecal microbiota transplantation — what it is, how it works, and what the research shows.

12 min
Watch the full video
Enter your details below to watch Dr Froomes explain FMT and the latest clinical evidence.
Please enter your first name
Please enter a valid email address
Your details are kept private and never shared. Privacy policy
Personalised

Has FMT been studied for your situation?

Answer 5 quick questions and we'll show you the published research most relevant to your condition.

1 of 5
What condition or symptoms are you exploring FMT for?
Select all that apply.
Please select at least one condition.
How long have you been experiencing symptoms?
Select the closest option.
Please select one option.
Have you tried other treatments?
Select all that apply.
Please select at least one option.
A couple more questions…
Has a healthcare provider discussed FMT with you?
Are you seeking information for…
Please answer both questions.
What's your biggest question about FMT?
Optional — this helps us understand what matters most to you.
Your personalised FMT research summary
Based on your selections, here's what the published research shows.
Want to learn more about whether FMT research applies to your situation?
Get in touch with our team
Regulation

FMT in Australia — the regulatory landscape

Understanding how FMT is regulated, what's approved, and how patients can legally access treatment in Australia.

FMT is regulated as a biological in Australia

Since 1 July 2021, all FMT products supplied in Australia must be included in the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG) and comply with mandatory manufacturing and safety standards. The TGA classifies FMT as a biological — in the same regulatory family as blood products and tissue transplants — not a drug or a device.

This means every FMT product must meet the requirements of TGO 105 (the Therapeutic Goods Order specifically written for FMT), be manufactured under Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP), and be traceable from donor to recipient. Australia's framework is among the most structured in the world — far more defined than the US, where the FDA still regulates FMT under "enforcement discretion."

What FMT is and isn't approved for

There is a critical distinction between FMT's one approved indication and its many investigational uses. Understanding this difference is essential for anyone exploring FMT.

TGA-approved
Recurrent C. difficile infection — the only indication with full regulatory approval. Two ARTG-listed products: Biomictra (BiomeBank, SA) and Lifeblood Microbiota Transplant (Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, WA).
Requires an accredited gastroenterologist
All other conditions — including ulcerative colitis, IBS, autism, depression, Parkinson's, and the 30+ conditions reviewed on this page — require an ARTG-accredited specialist who can access FMT through clinical trials, the Special Access Scheme, or the Authorised Prescriber pathway.

This does not mean FMT is unproven for these conditions — it means the regulatory approval process hasn't been completed. The evidence reviewed on this page comes from published clinical trials conducted under rigorous ethical oversight.

What "TGA-accredited" donor screening means

TGO 105 mandates a three-tier screening protocol that is among the most rigorous donor evaluation processes in medicine. Only donors who pass all three tiers can contribute to an FMT product.

1
Medical history & lifestyle questionnaire
Comprehensive screening for risk factors including recent travel, antibiotic use, sexual health, family history of GI and autoimmune disease, and lifestyle factors affecting microbiome health.
2
Blood & stool pathology testing
Mandatory laboratory panel: HIV, Hepatitis A/B/C/E, syphilis, HTLV, EBV, CMV, Strongyloides, plus stool testing for C. difficile, multi-drug resistant organisms (ESBL, VRE, CRE), parasites, ova, and enteric pathogens.
3
Physical assessment & ongoing monitoring
Medical examination plus ongoing surveillance with repeat testing at defined intervals throughout the donation period. Any new risk factor triggers immediate exclusion.
Only 4.5% of potential donors pass screening. BiomeBank has reported that fewer than 1 in 20 applicants meet the stringent TGO 105 criteria — comparable to the selectivity of blood donor screening, but with additional microbiome-specific requirements.

Why many Australians struggle to access FMT

Despite growing evidence and a well-defined regulatory framework, accessing FMT in Australia remains difficult for most patients, for several interconnected reasons:

Limited awareness among clinicians. Most gastroenterologists are familiar with FMT for C. difficile, but many remain unaware of the breadth of published evidence for conditions like ulcerative colitis, IBS, or neurological disorders. Patients frequently report that their specialists have not heard of FMT being studied for their condition.

Few accredited providers. There are only a small number of TGA-accredited FMT products currently listed on the ARTG. The two commercial stool banks — Biomictra (BiomeBank, Adelaide) and Lifeblood Microbiota Transplant (Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Perth) — supply frozen product nationally. In addition, Dr Paul Froomes, a board-certified gastroenterologist based in Melbourne, holds an independent ARTG Class 1 biological listing (ARTG 375147) for both fresh and frozen FMT, making him one of only three accredited FMT providers in the country. Geographic concentration and -80°C cold chain requirements mean access outside major capitals can involve significant logistical challenges.

No PBS subsidy. FMT products accessed through the Special Access Scheme are not subsidised by the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. The full cost — including the product, specialist consultation, and procedure — is borne by the patient.

Administrative burden. The SAS pathway requires the treating specialist to prepare documentation, submit an application, and await TGA approval before treatment can proceed. While designed to ensure safety, this process adds time and complexity that can be a barrier for both clinicians and patients.

How FMT is accessed for non-CDI conditions

The TGA's Special Access Scheme (SAS) is the primary legal pathway for Australians to receive FMT for conditions beyond recurrent C. difficile. It allows registered medical practitioners to prescribe unapproved therapeutic goods on a case-by-case basis when standard treatments have been inadequate.

Step 1
Specialist assessment
Documented history of failed or inadequate standard treatments
Step 2
SAS Category B application
Clinician submits clinical justification to TGA
Step 3
TGA approval
Written authorisation issued before treatment can proceed
Step 4
FMT administered
By specialist using TGA-accredited product

Key requirements: The treating doctor must be an AHPRA-registered specialist, must have considered all ARTG-listed alternatives, and must obtain written informed consent from the patient. The patient cannot apply directly — only the treating clinician can initiate the SAS process.

Patients cannot apply for SAS access themselves. The application must come from a registered medical practitioner. If your current doctor is unfamiliar with FMT or the SAS pathway, a specialist with FMT experience can guide the process.

The Australian FMT landscape is evolving

2018
TGA stakeholder forum in Melbourne — first formal consultation on FMT regulation
2020
TGO 105 published — Australia's first mandatory standard for FMT donor screening, manufacturing, and traceability
2021
New regulatory framework commences (1 July) — all FMT products must be ARTG-listed and GMP-compliant
2021
Dr Paul Froomes listed on the ARTG (September) — Class 1 biological (ARTG 375147) for fresh and frozen FMT, one of the first individual practitioners accredited in Australia
2022
Biomictra approved (BiomeBank) — Australia's first ARTG-listed FMT product; now supplied to 33+ hospitals nationally
2024
Lifeblood Microbiota Transplant approved (Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, September) — second TGA-accredited FMT product
2024
TGA releases consultation paper on future FMT regulation — exploring updated frameworks including a potential new Class 1 biological category to accommodate the evolving FMT field
Now
Oral capsule development, defined microbial consortia, and next-generation FMT products are in active development — the field is moving toward standardised, scalable treatments

Australia is positioned at the forefront of FMT regulation globally. As clinical evidence matures — particularly for ulcerative colitis, where five RCTs now exist — expansion of approved indications is expected. The TGA's willingness to engage with FMT-specific standards and actively consult on future frameworks signals a regulatory environment that is evolving alongside the science.

Get in touch

Ask us a question about FMT

Whether you're a patient, parent, or clinician — we're here to help you navigate the research and understand your options.

Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email
Please select a condition
Please select who this is for
Private & secure
Typically responds within 24 hours
No obligation
Thank you — we've received your question
A member of our team will review your enquiry and get back to you, usually within one business day. In the meantime, feel free to explore the research above.